-
1 fallacious deduction
Общая лексика: ложный вывод -
2 Fallacious deduction
خصم خاطئ -
3 deduction
1. n вычитание, удержание2. n удержание, вычет3. n мат. вычитаемое4. n скидка, сбавка; уступка5. n вывод, заключение, следствие6. n лог. выведение, дедукцияto draw a deduction — сделать вывод, вывести следствие
Синонимический ряд:1. inference (noun) answer; conclusion; illation; inference; judgement; judgment; ratiocination; result; sequitur2. inferring (noun) concluding; inferring; reasoning3. reduction (noun) abatement; abstraction; discount; excision; rebate; reduction; removal; subtraction -
4 deduction
[dıʹdʌkʃ(ə)n] n1. 1) вычитание, удержаниеdeduction of a sum from smb.'s pay - удержание определённой суммы из зарплаты
2) удержание, вычет2. мат. вычитаемое3. скидка, сбавка; уступка4. 1) вывод, (умо)заключение, следствие2) лог. выведение, дедукцияto draw a deduction - сделать вывод, вывести следствие
to reach an opinion through /by/ deduction - прийти к какому-л. выводу с помощью дедукции
-
5 fallacious
1. a неправильный; ошибочный, ложный2. a обманчивый, иллюзорныйСинонимический ряд:1. illogical (adj.) false; illogical; invalid; irrational; mad; nonrational; reasonless; sophistic; specious; spurious; unreasonable; unreasoned2. misleading (adj.) beguiling; deceiving; deceptive; deluding; delusive; delusory; false; fraudulent; misleading3. off (adj.) erroneous; inaccurate; incorrect; mistaken; off; unsound; untrue; wrongАнтонимический ряд: -
6 deduction
вычитание; выводto draw a deduction — сделать вывод, вывести следствие
English-Russian dictionary of Information technology > deduction
-
7 deduction
dɪˈdʌkʃən сущ.
1) а) вычет;
удержание( for;
from) ;
снижение, сокращение to make a deduction ≈ вычитать Our employer makes a deduction from our salary for the income tax. ≈ Наш работодатель вычитает из нашего жалованья подоходный налог. Syn: subtracting, deducting, abatement б) вычитаемое (число, сумма, величина и т.д.) Syn: subtrahend
2) сбавка, скидка, уступка Syn: discount, rebate
3) а) логический вывод (процедура получения умозаключения), дедукция б) вывод, заключение illogical deduction ≈ нелогичный вывод logical deduction ≈ логичный вывод a deduction about ≈ заключение о These events confirm my deduction that he was to blame. ≈ Эти события подтвердили мое заключение о том, что он виновен. to make a deduction ≈ делать заключение Syn: conclusion, reasoning Ant: induction вычитание, удержание - * of a sum from smb.'s pay удержание определенной суммы из зарплаты удержание, вычет - after * of taxes после удержания налогов - to make a * удерживать (математика) вычитаемое скидка, сбавка;
уступка - a * in the yearly rent скидка на годовую ренту - he wouldn't give me a * on it он не сделает мне скидки на это вывод, (умо) заключение, следствие - fallacious * ложный вывод (логика) выведение, дедукция - to draw a * сделать вывод, вывести следствие - to reach an opinion through /by/ * прийти к какому-л. выводу с помощью дедукции advance ~ авансовый вычет advance ~ предварительное удержание after ~ of за вычетом allowable ~ налог. законная льгота allowable ~ разрешенная скидка basic ~ основной вычет deduction вывод, следствие ~ вывод, заключение;
лог. дедукция ~ вывод ~ вычет ~ вычитаемое ~ вычитание, удержание ~ вычитание, вычет;
удержание;
deduction in pay вычеты, удержания из жалованья ~ вычитание ~ дедукция ~ скидка ~ следствие ~ удержание ~ умозаключение ~ уступка ~ for assessment purposes удержание в целях налогообложения ~ for social security удержание в целях социального обеспечения ~ вычитание, вычет;
удержание;
deduction in pay вычеты, удержания из жалованья ~ of expenditure удержание расходов ~ of interest on premature withdrawal удержание процентов при преждевременном снятии вклада ~ of tax удержание налога disallowed ~ неразрешенное удержание disallowed ~ неразрешенный вычет dividends received ~ вычет из полученного дивиденда excess ~ чрезмерный вычет harmonization ~ соц. скидка для согласованного налогообложения interest ~ процентный вычет invalid's ~ скидка для инвалидов legal ~ удержание по суду maintenance ~ удержание алиментов medical cost ~ вычет на оплату медицинского обслуживания mortgage interest ~ вычет с процента по закладной mortgage interest ~ скидка с процента по закладной nonitemized ~ удержание, не распределенное по статьям percentage ~ процентная скидка с налога personal ~ вычет из личного дохода, не подлежащий обложению repurchase ~ удержание при покупке ранее проданного товара resulting ~ вчт. регулирующий вывод salary ~ вычет из заработной платы salary ~ удержание из заработной платы standard ~ вчт. нормативный вычет standard ~ стандартная сумма дохода, не облагаемая индивидуальным подоходным налогом subsidiary ~ вчт. вспомогательный вывод tax ~ взимание налога tax ~ удержание налога tax ~ based on degree of disability снижение ставки налога в зависимости от группы инвалидности wage ~ вычеты из зарплатыБольшой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > deduction
-
8 resulting deduction
to draw a deduction — сделать вывод, вывести следствие
-
9 subsidiary deduction
to draw a deduction — сделать вывод, вывести следствие
-
10 ложный вывод
1) General subject: fallacious deduction, fallacy, fallacy (в статистике)2) Mathematics: false inference3) Law: non sequitur4) Economy: false conclusion -
11 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
См. также в других словарях:
Quantifier shift — A logical fallacy in which the quantifiers of a statement are erroneously transposed. The change in the logical nature of the statement may not be obvious when it is stated in a natural language like English. Definition The fallacious deduction… … Wikipedia
paralogism — n. illogical or fallacious deduction. ♦ paralogical, ♦ paralogistic, a. ♦ paralogize, v.i. be illogical; draw unwarranted conclusions. ♦ paralogist, n … Dictionary of difficult words
Austrian School — Part of a series on Libertarianism Austrian School … Wikipedia
List of fallacies — For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common misconceptions. A fallacy is incorrect argumentation in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness. Contents 1 Formal fallacies 1.1… … Wikipedia
Fallacy — In logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually incorrect argumentation in reasoning resulting in a misconception or presumption. By accident or design, fallacies may exploit emotional triggers in the listener or interlocutor (appeal to emotion), or… … Wikipedia
nature, philosophy of — Introduction the discipline that investigates substantive issues regarding the actual features of nature as a reality. The discussion here is divided into two parts: the philosophy of physics and the philosophy of biology. In this… … Universalium
Existence of God — The Existence of God † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Existence of God The topic will be treated as follows: I. As Known Through Natural Reason A. The Problem Stated 1. Formal Anti Theism 2. Types of Theism B.… … Catholic encyclopedia
Novum Organum — The title page illustration of Instauratio magna The Novum Organum, full original title Novum Organum Scientiarum, is a philosophical work by Francis Bacon, written in Latin and published in 1620. The title translates as new instrument, i.e. new… … Wikipedia
Outline of logic — The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to logic: Logic – formal science of using reason, considered a branch of both philosophy and mathematics. Logic investigates and classifies the structure of statements and… … Wikipedia
Pythagoreans and Eleatics — Edward Hussey PYTHAGORAS AND THE EARLY PYTHAGOREANS Pythagoras, a native of Samos, emigrated to southern Italy around 520, and seems to have established himself in the city of Croton. There he founded a society of people sharing his beliefs and… … History of philosophy
Fact — For other uses, see Fact (disambiguation). A fact (derived from the Latin Factum, see below) is something that has really occurred or is actually the case. The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability, that is whether it can be shown… … Wikipedia